Professor: If you had actual skills, you wouldn’t be a writer →

I often remind my students that, despite their belief that they have important knowledge to communicate to the world at large through their poetry, their status as poets already suggests that they have failed to make any momentous discovery that might have otherwise contributed to the history of knowledge; otherwise, the students might have exploited this insight in far more lucrative vocations, like the sciences or even business. I remind my students that they are probably taking my class in poetry because “math is hard” — and since they have no other worthy skills, they have chosen to accept their demotion to a lowly caste of literate nobodies. I get a few nervous giggles from the students after these waggish tirades — but then I underline my argument by saying that, if students really do believe that they are communicating, heretofore undiscovered, revelations to the public, then the proper genre for transmitting such a discovery is definitely not a poem, but a press conference….

Ouch. I had this conversation the other day while interviewing a theatre critic who also writes plays. I asked him if it was true that those who can’t write about those who can. He told me he didn’t believe that at all. I guess I could be back in theatre if I wanted to — in a different interview last week, someone tried to rope me into submitted the one play I’ve written to a playwriting competition. (via The Mumpsimus)